Sustainable Food

Mike Taylor for Food Safety Coordinator

Published July 02, 2009 @ 09:59PM PT

Obama's considering appointing a former Monsanto vice president, Mike Taylor, to head the Food Safety Working Group at the FDA.

As Jill Richardson writes at LaVidaLocavore at the link above, Taylor thinks the FDA wastes too much time on food safety inspections at meat packing plants. Further, he believes that one of their main problems is that they have to slow down their line speed too much.

Everyone who's read anything about the horrendous working conditions at US meatpacking plants knows that incomplete kills before slaughter and worker injuries increase dramatically when line speeds increase.

As also noted at the Ethicurean, Taylor is the reason milk from rBGH/rBST cows doesn't have to be labeled. Bovine growth hormone is perfectly safe, after all. Except for cows, or humans who drink its breakdown products in milk.

So yes, Mike Taylor is the person we have to thank for putting pus from mastitis-infected cows into the milk supply, and exposing milk-drinking Americans by the millions to greater cancer risks.

This guy is heading up a food safety working group.

I'm just swimming in the changeiness.

Related Posts

Comments (10)

  1. L.S. hope

       Apparently, Mr. Taylor has never had food poisoning before. Maybe we should stop washing our fresh produce, before we eat it too? (I'm being cynical, no rude retorts please.)

    Posted by L.S. hope on 07/03/2009 @ 08:35PM PT

  2. Reply to thread
  3. mike thornton

    I'm pretty sure that animals that suffer from an "unkosher" death have high levels of the "stress hormone" in them. Consuming such meat probably increases emotional and mental illness in humans. Meat is risky, but I do think meat producers could just clone steak pieces without all the icky stuff. Technology is advancing. We no longer have to kill animals for meat if we study how to produce cloned meat. I heard something about it in the news before. Cattle-herding is detrimental to the earth and a big cause of deforestation. Wouldn't cloned meat be healthier, less expensive, and use less resources? Good ideas.

    Posted by mike thornton on 07/03/2009 @ 10:10PM PT

  4. Natasha Chart

    I don't know about cloning thick slabs of muscle tissue. When you try to get a layer of cells much thicker than skin, you have to start worrying about the nutrient delivery that would otherwise be supplied by a fully pressurized circulatory system. That circulatory system would need to be filled with an oxygenated nutrient bath that could also carry away waste, which would additionally necessitate a kidney dialysis sort of apparatus to filter it.

    For living cells, they have to be kept at body temperature, which is warm enough to nurture bacteria instead of kill them in the abscence of a protective coating of skin. You'd need disease-fighting agents akin to the white cells produced in bone marrow, because you couldn't just sit the whole thing in an antiseptic bath - that would kill the cells.

    Then there are the regulatory hormones, the cellular signaling that tells the cells to grow, to divide, where they should multiply and when they should stop. Only cancer cells can be put in a dish and just keep growing to no particular purpose.

    Anyway, those are just a few hurdles I can think of offhand. Thing is, bodies do a lot to direct, nourish and protect the tissue within. It's complicated, or if it wasn't, someone would have done it by now.

    Posted by Natasha Chart on 07/06/2009 @ 12:45AM PT

  5. Reply to thread
  6. mike thornton

    Mass production of domestic animals is messy and expensive. Lets go back to growing veggies and fruit. Less cholesterol.

    Posted by mike thornton on 07/03/2009 @ 10:13PM PT

  7. Sue G.

    Choosing this guy isn't "change we can believe in".  It's "more of the same".  

     

     

    Posted by Sue G. on 07/04/2009 @ 07:28PM PT

  8. Sue G.

    Is this current?

     

    Also, now that the voting on the top 10 ideas on change.org was finished around the beginning of the year, what's happening now?  Is any feedback on issues like this getting to the Obama Administration?

     

     

    Posted by Sue G. on 07/04/2009 @ 07:36PM PT

  9. Kyle Lucas

    Natasha, hello from a fellow Greener, and thanks for the posts on food safety and Mike Taylor. I'm cross-posting to my FB and Twitter pages. Look forward to following you. Again, thanks!

    Posted by Kyle Lucas on 07/06/2009 @ 02:39PM PT

  10. Mary M

    Can this be the same Michael Taylor that Marion Nestle speaks of here?  Can't be--she doesn't address pus at all.  You think she'd know something about it.

    http://www.foodpolitics.com/2009/07/michael-taylor-appointed-to-fda-a-good-choice/

    Posted by Mary M on 07/07/2009 @ 12:45PM PT

  11. Bill Uicker

    This is totally not current.  Michael Taylor is not on the Food Safety Working Group.  See here:

    http://www.foodsafetyworkinggroup.gov/FSWG_Key_Findings.pdf

    The group is headed by Kathleen Sebalius and Tom Vilsack.

    Posted by Bill Uicker on 07/07/2009 @ 09:05PM PT

  12. Food Safety Certification Jaffry

    there are some mis conceptions, it doesn't matter who is in the food safety team and who is not, the thing is who so ever is in the team he should work positively and should be able to bring up some changes which may effect the efficiency of food safety depart in the positive way.

    Posted by Food Safety Certification Jaffry on 07/10/2009 @ 11:35AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Natasha Chart

Natasha is an amateur eater with severe snarkolepsy and a c. 2002 blogging habit. She had a fabulous time studying ecological agriculture and policy at The Evergreen State College, and even did her homework while writing at various times for pacificviews.org, boomantribune.com, and mydd.com.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action. If you already have an account click here.

  Cancel