Protect Our Food Supply – Stop National Animal ID
Published January 13, 2009 @ 06:07AM PT
A policy posing one of the greatest threats to local and sustainable agriculture is the National Animal Identification System (NAIS). Under NAIS, anyone who owns even one livestock animal will have to register their property, tag each animal (in most cases with electronic tags), and report a long list of movements to a database within 24 hours. This issue is among the ideas being voted on for the Top 10 Ideas for Change in America:
NAIS will drive local family and organic farms out of business and impose burdens on everyone from recreational horse owners to people in poverty who are trying to raise food for themselves. It will not stop animal disease or improve food safety. NAIS will only enrich the corporations that already control most of our food supply.
NAIS was first the brainchild of multinational companies seeking to open foreign markets to US beef. In the 1980s and 1990s, they worked with technology companies and agribusiness associations to develop a plan to require electronic identification of every single livestock animal in the country. They then convinced USDA to take the program on after the agency was given expanded powers in the wake of 9/11.
USDA’s original NAIS plan, published in 2005, called for every single livestock animal – including those kept as pets (such as potbellied pigs or riding horses) or for people’s personal food supply – to be registered, tagged (in most cases using an implantable microchip or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag), and for the owner to report all movements on or off the property within 24 hours. Covered animals include horses, chickens, cows, sheep, goats, pigs, llamas, alpacas, and other livestock and poultry.
Think about it: Every gift of a baby lamb, every grade school that teaches kids about baby chicks, every kid in a 4-H show, every trail ride and local rodeo, every grandmother with a few laying hens – all of these people and activities will be subject to extensive government surveillance. And the databases would be controlled by private for-profit companies making fat profits at our expense.
The agribusiness companies that wrote the plan made sure they had a loophole. Factory confinement farms, raising thousands of chickens or hogs in a building filled with their own waste, will be able to use “group identification.” Yet an organic pastured poultry farmer will be stuck tagging each chicken.
The USDA has not done a cost-benefit analysis. Based on estimates from Australia and England, NAIS could cost anywhere from $30-$69 per animal on average. The costs include the tags, the labor and equipment needed to tag each animal and file reports of the movements within 24 hours, and the massive databases needed to track over 100 million animals. Factory farms can use group ID to avoid many of the costs, while small farmers could face even higher costs because of economies of scale.
With a profit margin of less than $100 on most cattle, sheep or goats selling for less than that, and chickens selling for just a few dollars, these costs are prohibitive for small farmers and individual animal owners.
After public outcry, USDA changed its tune to claim that NAIS would be “voluntary at the federal level.” Yet the agency used both carrots and sticks to push states to implement NAIS. Parts of the program have been implemented on a mandatory basis in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Indiana, while other states have used coercion, bribery, and deception to increase participation. The USDA recently wrote a memo that clearly makes the first stage of NAIS (the registration of people’s property) mandatory. Indeed, the earlier version of the memo called for labeling out those who did not “volunteer” to register, so there would be a list of resisters. Under pressure from USDA, several states have adopted laws authorizing state implementation of NAIS that include heavy fines and even criminal penalties.
President-Elect Obama can easily stop this program. He should direct the new USDA Undersecretary of Marketing and Regulatory Programs to revoke the existing memos and guidance documents, and stop signing cooperative agreements with industry entities and the states for NAIS implementation. These actions would have tremendous positive impacts on small farmers and poor communities across the country, as well as promoting environmental and human health by supporting the local, sustainable agriculture movement.
Please support a healthy and safe food supply that provides a truly sustainable future for us all. NAIS works against that because it:
1. Financially harms local, organic farms, which are critical to our food security and the environment
2. Will not improve food safety, since the tracking ends at the time of slaughter, while e.coli and salmonella contaminations usually come from slaughter or storage conditions
3. Deprives consumers of the choice to buy from small, local farmers and obtain pastured meats and eggs.
4. Is unnecessary, because we already have working programs for tracking commercial livestock
5. Is unconstitutional and violates people’s privacy, property rights, and the religious beliefs of groups such as the Amish
6. Wastes taxpayer dollars: USDA has spent over $100 million simply to implement the first stage of the program for a fraction of the nation’s farms
7. Helps Big Business at the expense of Main Street – Agribusiness corporations created this program to price small farming operations out of business, furthering their monopolies.
Mainstream agriculture has led to corporate control of the food supply, pollution of our air and water, poisons in our foods, failing rural communities, greater dependence on foreign oil, and a disease epidemic in this country. The local sustainable agriculture movement can reverse these trends. But government policies that promote factory farms at the expense of sustainable farms threaten our ability to make the change we need. Please help bring attention to this issue by voting to stop the NAIS.
For more information about NAIS and what else you can do to help protect sustainable farms from this threat, go to Farm and Ranch Freedom.
(Photo credit: Irish Typepad on Flickr.)
Share this Post
Related Posts
Comments (7)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Judith McGeary is an organic farmer, attorney, and local foods activist. She and her husband have a small farm with chickens, turkeys, sheep, cows, and horses (who think they are really lapdogs). They are committed to managing the farm holistically to provide the healthiest food possible, improve the ecosystem, and respect the gifts of the soil, plants, and animals.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















I try to take into account all points of view as well as the genuine interests of everyone before commenting on anything and I see the tunnel vision some of you have when it comes to your perceived threat of vegans plotting to make meat eaters stop eating the disgusting stuff called meat, that is the muscles, guts and dismembered pieces of living SENTIENT BEINGS about whom meat eaters care very little indeed in real terms.
Thanks to a specious (racist) upbringing, whereby people are conditioned to consider and treat others as inferior and therefore less worthy of their respect, farm animals continue to be exploited and treated as ¨food¨, while, for example, Palestinians are being massacred and treated as terrorists in the Middle East, because the rogue state of Israel refuses to grant them equal rights.
In conclusion, a non-human animal may be regarded either as a sentient being and respected and not eaten or killed, or as a ¨tasty¨ morsel which requires the systematic exploitation and slaughter techniques necessary to bring them to the meat eater´s table, While a terrorist label is the preferred excuse to destroy those chosen as enemies for political gain, never mind how young or innocent... the choice is ours: .... Are we prepared to believe that eating meat is important and/or necessary, to continue doing so?, or rather start questioning the deeply ingrained habits that are costing animals their lives and destroying planet Earth?...
.... And do we prefer to believe political lies at the root of ongoing massacres, or to start questioning the accuracy and sincerity of governments and their hidden selfish political agendas, at the root of human conflicts?...
Do we really care about justice, health and a sustainable planet?... Are we really moving towards sustainable lives or confortable lives?
Francisco Martin
Posted by francisco Martin on 01/15/2009 @ 07:46PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"I try to take into account all points of view as well as the genuine interests of everyone before commenting on anything and I see the tunnel vision some of you have when it comes to your perceived threat of vegans plotting to make meat eaters stop eating the disgusting stuff called meat, that is the muscles, guts and dismembered pieces of living SENTIENT BEINGS about whom meat eaters care very little indeed in real terms."
Wow, good job on being "fair and balanced". You DO realize that NAIS affects everyone that owns a pet pony, chicken, goat, or rabbit, etc, and who would never consider putting it on a plate, too, right? Even the "rescued" ones?
And when the gov't comes to confiscate your pets and murder them before your eyes, in the name of national security, that will be OK with you, I suppose? The animals will be just as dead. And the gov't wins again.
Posted by Black Horse on 01/16/2009 @ 05:20PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"I try to take into account all points of view as well as the genuine interests of everyone before commenting on anything"
Then you aren't doing a very good job. I'm a horse owner that is opposed to NAIS. My horses are not part of the food chain, and they get the best care I can give them. I like them better than most people - especially you. NAIS will take away my property rights, and if it forces me to give up my horses, where are you going to get your organic fertilizer for your veggies?
And, WTF do the Palestinians and Israel have to do with this topic? Would you like to roll out any more of your prejudices?
Posted by Barbara Steever on 01/20/2009 @ 04:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I apologised for posting my comment on the issue of "Eating animals" here, but it is nevertheless part of the debate on Sustainable Food. I also said that I am opposed on principle to the tagging of non-human animals just as I am opposed to slavery. By the way, I write this on the day Barack Obama has become the first African American President of the USA, something that would have been unthinkable 50 years ago, and much less likely when the Founding Fathers of America themselves owned slaves like many today own non-human animals.As a vegan I use veganic (vegetable) fertiliser for my veggies, but I am not against organic fertiliser except that from animal prisons or concentration camps.And, YES, the Israeli Palestinian conflict has a lot to do with who we are and whether justice, respect and compassion are our guiding principles instead of the rule of gun.I am afraid it is not my prejudices that are in the way of human progress but rather the prejudices and privileges of those who have not yet evolved and still believe that some humans and, of course, non-human animals are unworthy of the same consideration due to those human beings we consider worthy of our respect.
Francisco Martin
PS for Barbara Steever... your "WTF" remark about events that have shaken the civilised people of the world over the last few weeks, says more about your own prejudices, ignorance and / or lack of concern for the thousands of innocent Palestinians murdered and maimed in Gaza (even under the protection of the United Nations, without political or legal justification) than about your humanitarian qualities.
Posted by francisco Martin on 01/20/2009 @ 07:42PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
What's happening in the Middle East is a completely separate topic than animal ID. While it is unfortunate that so many Palestinian civilians have been killed, Hamas instigated it and then hid behind the innocents- just like other terrorists throughout the world. So, let's not start another war here.
Stay on topic - even if you don't have a clue about NAIS.
Posted by Barbara Steever on 01/20/2009 @ 08:05PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Please stop NAIS!!! The Obama admistration claims that large farms will be held accountable for bad ways, but NAIS will disproportionately hurt SMALL FARMERS!!! Help end our reliance on fossil fuels by supporting localized endeavours, like small farms, and not the fuel hog machine that is midwest farming.
Posted by Ashley Drum on 03/14/2009 @ 09:28PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Veterans Against NAIS - spread the word
Please post / email the link to this petition to anyone you feel would be able to inform veterans and their families so they can add their voices to the ones speaking out against NAIS. The petition will automatically notify your representatives based on your zip code and could not be easier.
http://petition2congress.com/2/1903/veterans-against-nais/
Respectfully,
Mike Murphy
Posted by Mike Murphy on 05/23/2009 @ 06:40PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.