The Meat Market's Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Published August 04, 2009 @ 08:38PM PT
Dear The Meat Industry,
When you complain on one hand that your business will be hurt by country of origin labeling laws, and on the other that it's unfair to criticize the US meat industry because of greenhouse gas emissions from meat production in other countries, it makes you sound like you need Ritalin.
In other news, cows need to eat grass, bozos.
Kissy the face,
n
(Photo credit: laenulfean on Flickr.)
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Livestock Responsible for 51% of Emissions, Says Worldwatch Institute
-
Collin Peterson, Congress in Denial
-
Monday Breakfast
Comments (1)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Dear Ms. Chart,
To compare Country of Origin Labeling and greenhouse gas emissions is comparing apples and oranges, at best. We opposed country of original labeling laws because it served as an impediment to trade and raised the cost of doing business for meat companies and the cost of eating meat for consumers. As for greenhouse gas emissions, the U.S. meat industry is one of the most efficient on the planet at producing our products, which means our environmental footprint is much smaller than that of our competitors. These two issues have nothing in common.
Thomas Super
American Meat Institute
tsuper@meatami.com
Posted by Thomas Super on 08/05/2009 @ 08:30AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.